Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Corticosteroid Iontophoresis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOsmanoğlu, Kasım
dc.contributor.authorYıldızgören, Mustafa Turgut
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Hayal
dc.contributor.authorTurhanoğlu, Ayşe Dicle
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T16:23:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T16:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (r-ESWT) and corticosteroid iontophoresis (CI) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).\rMaterial and Methods: This randomized prospective study included \ra total of 72 wrists diagnosed with CTS of 54 patients with a mean age \rof 42.2±8.7 years (range, 22-59 years). The patients were randomly \rseparated into two groups. Group 1 (n=37) received r-ESWT, and \rGroup 2 (n=35) received CI. Evaluations were made at baseline and at \r0, 1 and 3 months after treatment using the visual analog scale (VAS), \rBoston Symptom Severity Scale (BSSS), Boston Functional Capacity \rScale (BFCS), grip strength, and electrophysiological examination. Results: Compared to baseline, the VAS, BSSS, BFCS, grip strength values at the 0, 1 and 3 months after treatment improved significantly in \rboth groups (all p<0.001). However the nerve conduction study results \rwere significantly improved only in r-ESWT group (all p<0.001). \rWhen the change levels were compared between the groups, the decrease in VAS (all p<0.001), the improvement in BSSS (p=0.029, \rp=0.023 and p=0.040, respectively), BFCS (p<0.001, p=0.001 and \rp<0.001, respectively), grip strength (all p<0.001), sensory nerve conduction velocity (p=0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) and distal motor latency (p=0.001, p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) before \rand at 0, 1 and 3 months after treatment were significantly higher in \rthe r-ESWT group than the CI group. Conclusion: This study revealed \rthat both methods were useful in alleviating pain and improving function in CTS, however r-ESWT seems to be more effective than CI.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31609/jpmrs.2021-84159
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-3843
dc.identifier.issn1307-7384
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid515040en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31609/jpmrs.2021-84159
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/515040
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/16000
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Corticosteroid Iontophoresis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
16000.pdf
Boyut:
807.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu