Are HoLEP Surgical Videos on YouTube Biased and Misleading or Are They Leading the Industry?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoriducurmak, Ferhat/0000-0002-0513-8944
dc.authoridTamkac, Nezih/0000-0001-6903-7010
dc.authoridKoras, omer/0000-0001-9749-5254
dc.authoridGokalp, Fatih/0000-0003-3099-3317
dc.authoridKulak, Bilal/0000-0002-8630-0797
dc.authoridGORUR, Sadik/0000-0002-3458-5428
dc.contributor.authorKoras, Omer
dc.contributor.authorGokalp, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorYildirak, Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorSigva, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorTamkac, Nezih
dc.contributor.authorPorgali, Sefa Burak
dc.contributor.authorKulak, Bilal
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:26:45Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:26:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the content and quality of the most relevant YouTube videos related to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgery. Materials and Methods: The keywords HOLEP, laser enucleation and prostate enucleation were used to perform a search on YouTube. NonEnglish language videos, videos with less than 4-minute duration, and repetitive videos were excluded. The reactions of the viewers to the videos were evaluated by recording the total views, views/month and likes and dislikes parameters. The data were divided into two groups based on the source of upload: Group 1 consisted of healthcare providers and group 2 comprised of commercial companies and for-profit organizations. Results: A total of 117 videos were included in the study. A significant portion of the videos (77.7%) had been uploaded by healthcare providers. There was no statistically significant difference between the uploading groups in terms of the DISCERN and the Global Quality score, scores (p=0.484 and p=0.108, respectively). However, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials understandability and actionability scores were statistically significantly higher in group 2 (p=0.004 and p=0.022, respectively). In addition, when the misinformation scale was evaluated, there were significantly more videos with high-degree misinformation in group 2 (5.5% vs 33.3%, p=0.001). Conclusion: On video sharing platforms, such as YouTube, the number of reliable videos with accurate and appropriate guidance about diseases and treatments should be increased, and these videos should be allowed to be posted after they have been approved by relevant institutions, including healthcare associations and universities.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jus.galenos.2021.2021.0075
dc.identifier.endpage109en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9580
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage103en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid530226en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2021.2021.0075
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/530226
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10521
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000810548100005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Urological Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHoLEPen_US
dc.subjectpatient informationen_US
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.titleAre HoLEP Surgical Videos on YouTube Biased and Misleading or Are They Leading the Industry?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
293.73 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu