Comparison of Enamel Discoloration using Flash-Free and Conventional Adhesive Brackets with Different Finishing Protocols
dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Abdullah | |
dc.contributor.author | Zortuk, Fundagul Bilgic | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-18T20:59:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-18T20:59:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.department | Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flash-free and conventional adhesive brackets and different finishing techniques on enamel discoloration. Methods: Forty human premolar teeth were utilized and randomly divided into four groups based on the type of brackets and finishing technique: (1) Gemini((R)) brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. (2) Gemini((R)) suspenders were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding the brackets, adhesive remnants were cleaned using12-blade APC(TM) Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur and polished with Sof-Lex disks. (4) APC(TM) Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, the adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. A Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer was used to measure the color change values of the 40 teeth. Results: The color change of the enamel surface in the Flash Free bracket group was significantly less than that in the conventional groups (p=0.003 p < 0.05). The mean.E values obtained from the Sof-Lex groups were lower than those obtained from the groups without Sof-Lex, but these results were not statistically significant (p=0.280 p > 0.05). Conclusion: It is recommended to use Flash-Free brackets and polish with Sof-Lex disk following the clean-up procedures to minimize the possibility of discoloration of the teeth during orthodontic treatment. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.154 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 253 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2148-9505 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38164012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85181513761 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 248 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1242639 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.154 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1242639 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12508 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001167607600005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Galenos Publ House | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Teeth discoloration | en_US |
dc.subject | adhesive precoated brackets | en_US |
dc.subject | spectrophotometer | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Enamel Discoloration using Flash-Free and Conventional Adhesive Brackets with Different Finishing Protocols | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1