Comparison of Enamel Discoloration using Flash-Free and Conventional Adhesive Brackets with Different Finishing Protocols

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorZortuk, Fundagul Bilgic
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:59:18Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:59:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flash-free and conventional adhesive brackets and different finishing techniques on enamel discoloration. Methods: Forty human premolar teeth were utilized and randomly divided into four groups based on the type of brackets and finishing technique: (1) Gemini((R)) brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. (2) Gemini((R)) suspenders were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding the brackets, adhesive remnants were cleaned using12-blade APC(TM) Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur and polished with Sof-Lex disks. (4) APC(TM) Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, the adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. A Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer was used to measure the color change values of the 40 teeth. Results: The color change of the enamel surface in the Flash Free bracket group was significantly less than that in the conventional groups (p=0.003 p < 0.05). The mean.E values obtained from the Sof-Lex groups were lower than those obtained from the groups without Sof-Lex, but these results were not statistically significant (p=0.280 p > 0.05). Conclusion: It is recommended to use Flash-Free brackets and polish with Sof-Lex disk following the clean-up procedures to minimize the possibility of discoloration of the teeth during orthodontic treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.154
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38164012en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181513761en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage248en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1242639en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.154
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1242639
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12508
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001167607600005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTeeth discolorationen_US
dc.subjectadhesive precoated bracketsen_US
dc.subjectspectrophotometeren_US
dc.titleComparison of Enamel Discoloration using Flash-Free and Conventional Adhesive Brackets with Different Finishing Protocolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
346.77 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format