COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND SEMIAUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRONTAL AND SPHENOID SINUS AREA AND VOLUME USING OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
dc.contributor.author | Belgin, Ceren Aktuna | |
dc.contributor.author | Serindere, Gözde | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-19T16:23:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-19T16:23:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the manual and semi-automatic segmentation modules of the third-generation software used in computedtomography (CT) images in calculating frontal sinus (FS) and sphenoid sinus (SS) areas and volumes.Methods: CT images of 200 patients (96 female, 104 male) between the ages of 19 and 73 years (mean 37.38 ± 16.32 years) were randomly selected.Volume and area of FS and SS were segmented manually and semi-automatically using InVesalius 3.1.1 software (CTI, Campinas, São Paulo,Brazil).Results: There was a statistically significant difference was found the main SS area in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 4.80 ± 1.86 $cm^2$ and 4.84 ± 1.83 $cm^2$, respectively. The main SS volumes were in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 8.44 ± 3.55 $cm^3$and 9.62 ± 3.21 $cm^3$, respectively. The main FS volumes were in manual mode and semi-automatic mode as 5.32 ± 2.04 $cm^3$ and 6.65 ± 2.70 $cm^3$, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference was found between manual mode and semi-automatic mode in volume calculation (p<0.05).Conclusion: It was seen that the values measured in both segmentations are close to those presented in the mean literature data, however, whenusing the semi-automatic segmentation module, it should be ensured that the formations other than the structure to be evaluated are not included inthe measurement. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.30934/kusbed.836910 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 222 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-8571 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 216 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 459639 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.836910 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/459639 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/15957 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Semi-automatic segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Manual segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | sphenoid sinus | en_US |
dc.subject | frontal sinus | en_US |
dc.subject | computed tomography | en_US |
dc.title | COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND SEMIAUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRONTAL AND SPHENOID SINUS AREA AND VOLUME USING OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
- İsim:
- 15967.pdf
- Boyut:
- 559.66 KB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Tam Metin / Full Text