Efficacy of low dose and ultra-low dose on the visibility of peri-implant fenestration and dehiscences: a computed tomography study
dc.authorid | Orhan, Kaan/0000-0001-6768-0176 | |
dc.contributor.author | Aktuna-Belgin, Ceren | |
dc.contributor.author | Serindere, Gozde | |
dc.contributor.author | Belgin, Huseyin Berkay | |
dc.contributor.author | Serindere, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Orhan, Kaan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-18T20:11:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-18T20:11:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the visibility of peri-implant fenestration and dehiscences on computed tomography (CT) images taken with 2 different doses. Material and methods: The defects were created on the apical of 6 implants randomly selected from 20 titanium implants placed in the ribs, and dehiscences were created on the cervical of 8 implants. No defects were created around 6 implants. Macroscopic analysis of the implanted ribs was accepted as the gold standard. From the samples, images were taken by using both ultra-low dose (80 kVp, 50 mA, 1.25 mm slice thickness) and low dose (100 kVp, 50 mA, 1.25 mm slice thickness) protocols in CT. The images obtained were evaluated using a 5-point scale. Results: No significant difference was found between the area under the receiver operating characteristic of ultra-low dose protocol and low dose protocol in both defects based on the Wilcoxon test (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The ultra-low dose protocol could be applied by adhering to the as low as reasonably achievable principle in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5114/pjr.2022.112466 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | E29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0137-7183 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1899-0967 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35140825 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85124378938 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | #BAŞV! | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | E24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.112466 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9029 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 87 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000744035200001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Int Scientific Information Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Polish Journal of Radiology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | computed tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | radiation dose | en_US |
dc.subject | implant | en_US |
dc.subject | fenestration | en_US |
dc.subject | dehiscences | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of low dose and ultra-low dose on the visibility of peri-implant fenestration and dehiscences: a computed tomography study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |